Legal Opinion

Staley v. City of Oilton

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 4, 1996No. 86789PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Vice-Chief Judge:

Claimant Jim Staley was injured while performing community service for the City of Oilton (City) in lieu of payment of fines or imprisonment. ' He filed a workers’ compensation claim, alleging he was employed by City. City denied Staley was employed. After hearing, the trial judge entered an order denying Staley’s claim, finding that Staley was not an employee of City at the time of his injury. Staley filed an en banc appeal, and the three-judge panel affirmed.

In this review proceeding, Staley claims the trial court was required to find he was an employee…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Clinton v. White CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. RI Council 94, Afscme, Afl-Cio v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. Mooney v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API