Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1986No. 128,465; CA A34998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, P. J.,

Pro Tempore

This is an appeal from a denial of post-conviction relief. Petitioner argues that he was denied the right to be present at his post-conviction hearing as provided in ORS 138.620(1). He also contends that the post-conviction court erred when it found that his sentences for burglary and theft did not merge. We affirm.

On September 28,1976, a jury found petitioner guilty of burglary in the second degree and theft in the first degree. The circuit court sentenced him to consecutive terms of five years on these charges. Petitioner sought to have his convictions reversed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. DechandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. KylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Frost v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API