Legal Opinion

Gary v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1985No. 83-796, 84-703 and 84-997Published

1ConcurrenceNebeker, Associate Judge

I concur in the result the majority reaches in deciding the cases. I do not, however, join the majority’s holding in Part Y of the opinion, on the question of severability. It is unnecessary to decide the issue. In addition, I must express my concern that the majority, in affirming the convictions of Gary, Cole, and Pee, has subordinated the relevant facts of each case to the perceived critical — and political — issues. On the corroboration issue presented by Gary, I also concur in our holding that an instruction was not required. I do not agree with wandering beyond that issue by announcing…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API