Legal Opinion

Vernon Metal & Produce Co. v. Joseph Joseph & Bros.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the contract for a division of the net profits' of the enterprise, the defendant was entitled to charge the plaintiff’s share with its proper proportion of the defendant’s overhead expenses, in the absence of circumstances satisfying the court of the intention of the parties that such expenses were to be excluded. True it is that some circumstances tending to such exclusion may be discovered in this record, but they are not so decisive that their significance may be determined as an inference of law. The accounts rendered by the defendant at the close of the transactions did not give…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Weber v. Empire Holding Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In re BatteyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Schulman v. NeubardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Singer Metals, Inc. v. Industrial Mgmt. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API