Legal Opinion

Chappel v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1912No. 17,663Published

Appeal from Osage district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Thomas Chappel had a twenty-year mining lease on a tract of coal land, which gave him the exclusive right to mine the coal for that period, paying a royalty to the owner. The lessee of a neighboring tract, extended his operations into that controlled by Chappel, and took out a considerable quantity of coal. Chappel sued William Foster, the owner of the tract on which the other mine was located. He was denied relief and appeals.

Although a lessee who. has an exclusive right to conduct mining operations is not the owner of the mineral in place…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Baker v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Chamberlain v. CollinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Hartford Iron Mining Co. v. Cambria Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Arnold v. BennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API