O'Kane v. Daly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no proper service of the notice of appeal had been made. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action is brought by O’Kane to be discharged from a trust under an assignment made to him as assignee by Daly and Hawkins for the benefit of creditors, under the provisions of the Civil Code. Several of the creditors were made parties defendant, among others the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society. Daly and Hawkins were also made defendants.
The society above named answered, denied several allegations of the complaint, and among other matters alleged that the assignment to O’Kane was void, and asked that it be so adjudged. Mary and Jane O’Meara also in their answer asked that the assignment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Thompson v. EllsworthNew York Court of Chancery · 1846
- Hiscock v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
- In re Castle Dome Mining & Smelting Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
- Millikin v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Candelas v. RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.