Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 2005No. 04CA2136PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVogt, J.

Defendant, Charles D. Martinez, Jr., appeals the trial court's order denying his pro se motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

In August 2000, defendant pled guilty to vehicular assault-reckless driving, a class five felony, in exchange for the dismissal of another charge of vehicular assault-DUL.

At the January 2001 sentencing hearing, the trial court found that an aggravated range sentence, beyond the one- to three-year presumptive range for a class five felony, was warranted because defendant had committed an "offense against [a] person" and in light of defendant's prior eriminal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. State v. WeldeleMontana Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ElieColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. BanarkColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. ArkoColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. BlessettColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API