Legal Opinion

Lively v. Howard

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 2005No. 100,096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff Imogene Lively appeals a trial court order which overruled her Objection to Confirmation and Motion to Set Aside Appraisal in this partition action and directed the LeFlore County Sheriff to execute a deed to Defendant Dayne Howard. Plaintiff contends the trial court abused its discretion in doing so and in denying Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider. We conclude there was no abuse of discretion and affirm.

¶ 2 The Report of Commissioners was filed on May 19, 2003, indicating that partition could not be made and appraising the value of the land. As…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Herron Trust v. SwartsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. TwedtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Willis v. WillisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API