Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Kmart Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2001No. 20,977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This is a case involving error by a court clerk, neglect by a courier service, the result that a complaint was not file-stamped prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, and a trial court’s practical ruling permitting the case to proceed, which we affirm notwithstanding Defendant’s several technical, procedural arguments. Defendant appeals from a judgment, finding it liable for personal injuries sustained by Plaintiff as the result of an accident at Defendant’s store and awarding Plaintiff $700,000 for pain and suffering. On appeal, Defendant raises four…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Samad Salehpour v. University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Travel All Over the World, Inc., and Ibrahim Y. Elgindy v. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabian AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Gay v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. David v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. San Juan 1990-A., L.P. v. El Paso Production Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Littell v. Allstate Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Salopek v. FriedmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Salopek v. FriedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Salopek v. FriedmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API