Legal Opinion

Cudahy Foods Company v. Holloway

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1982No. 8114SC497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The sale in question brings the case within the statute of frauds provision of the Uniform Commercial Code, which reads in pertinent part:(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 25-2-201(1) (1965).

Plaintif…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Union Equity Co-Operative ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Azevedo v. MinisterNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Cement Asbestos Products Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. County of Milwaukee v. Northrop Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. Currituck Grain Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Everts v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Ferragamo v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Ready Trucking, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Hammer v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API