Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Ruperto

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1982No. 65679PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Plaintiff Virginia Carpenter appeals from an adverse decree in her action to quiet title to land adjacent to her residential premises based on a theory of adverse possession. Defendants Charles L. Ruperto, Edith C. Ruperto, and Tom McCormick cross-appeal from a portion of the decree awarding plaintiff limited relief on equitable grounds. We affirm on the merits of the appeal and dismiss the cross-appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The determinative question on the appeal is whether the trial court misinterpreted the law governing the claim of right element in finding plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goulding v. ShonquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Litchfield v. SewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. I-80 Associates, Inc. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Creel v. HammansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Pearson v. City of GuttenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hallett Construction Co. v. MeisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. C.H. Moore Trust Estate Ex Rel. Warner v. City of Storm LakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Louisa County Conservation Board v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
  5. Mitchell v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API