Legal Opinion

Emmco Insurance Co. v. Kuss

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1962No. 295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their suit to recover $371.49, property damage to the automobile of plaintiff, Patureau. Plaintiffs are, respectively, the insurer and the insured, the insurer seeking recovery as subrogee of plaintiffs’ claim, less $50.00, and the insured for recovery of the $50.00 withheld by insurer under the deductible clause. When referring to the manner in which the collision occurred, reference to “plaintiff” will necessarily be to Patureau only.

At the conclusion of the case, when the trial judge was asked for reasons for dismissing plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. DupepeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lambert v. FoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Mayon v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API