Legal Opinion

Henley v. . Holt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

This is the same case that was before us on plaintiff’s appeal at the Fall Term, 1938, reported in 214 N. C., 384, 199 S. E., 383, where the facts are set out and to which reference may be had to avoid repetition.. The trial court properly instructed the jury that the plaintiff was required to establish the parol trust, upon which he relies, by evidence clear, strong and convincing. Wilson v. Williams, 215 N. C., 407, 2 S. E. (2d), 19; Peterson v. Taylor, 203 N. C., 673, 166 S. E., 800; Gillespie v. Gillespie, 187 N. C., 40, 120 S. E., 822; Cunningham v. Long, 186 N. C., 526, 120…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Harding v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Avery v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API