Henley v. . Holt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
This is the same case that was before us on plaintiff’s appeal at the Fall Term, 1938, reported in 214 N. C., 384, 199 S. E., 383, where the facts are set out and to which reference may be had to avoid repetition.. The trial court properly instructed the jury that the plaintiff was required to establish the parol trust, upon which he relies, by evidence clear, strong and convincing. Wilson v. Williams, 215 N. C., 407, 2 S. E. (2d), 19; Peterson v. Taylor, 203 N. C., 673, 166 S. E., 800; Gillespie v. Gillespie, 187 N. C., 40, 120 S. E., 822; Cunningham v. Long, 186 N. C., 526, 120…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Harding v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Avery v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.