Legal Opinion

Marriage of Tinsley v. Tinsley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 1988No. C9-88-760Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Judith Tinsley moved for an order finding Stanley Tinsley in contempt for failing to pay child support, and entering judgment for arrearages. A family court referee denied the motion, and the trial judge affirmed on review. Judith Tinsley appeals the trial court’s refusal to enter judgment for arrearages.

FACTS

In January 1986, Judith Tinsley petitioned for dissolution of the parties’ four-year marriage. Stanley Tinsley did not answer the petition. In August, Judith Tinsley moved for custody of the parties’ minor child and for temporary child support of $309 per month.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Dent Ex Rel. Dent v. CasagaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Weinand v. WeinandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. ErlandsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API