Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. Teledyne Exploration

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 5, 1983No. 82-8PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAULKNER, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Jernigan and Carter, were joint owners of a parcel of real estate located about eight miles south of the Alabama border in Florida. Teledyne Exploration was a foreign corporation qualified to do business in Alabama. A representative of Teledyne at Teledyne’s office in Foley, Alabama, called Jernigan at his home in Brew-ton, Alabama, to request that Teledyne be allowed to enter the property in Florida in *881order to conduct tests there in connection with oil and gas exploration. During a subsequent telephone conversation an agreement was reached whereby Teledyne…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. IngersollSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Woolf v. McGaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Little v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. French v. Clinchfield Coal Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  5. Reasor-Hill Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AU Hotel, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte AU Hotel, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex parte Richard Mullen and Cheryl Mullen. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: CIVIL (In re: Karl Leo and Fay Leo v. Richard L. Mullen and Cheryl C. Mullen) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-22-902788).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024
  4. Jeehye Jung v. El Tinieblo International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API