Legal Opinion
Crossman v. Contractors Rigging and Erection
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1972No. File 10803PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Judge.
The four plaintiffs named in the title of this case brought separate actions against Contractors Rigging and Erection (Contractors Rigging) and Thomas Pass (Pass) to foreclose mechanics liens. Defendants' property was attached in each of the actions. The actions were consolidated for trial and appeal by stipulation.
Contractors Rigging, a California corporation the sole stockholder, director and officer of which is Thomas Pass, was the successful bidder to the United States Government on a $500,000 contract to remove personal property at three missile sites located in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lone Star Package Car Co., Inc. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Gottlieb v. Sandia American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Dragor Shipping Corporation, a Corporation, Formerly Ward Industries Corporation v. Union Tank Car Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Don A. Hasse, Administrator of the Estate of Frances Hasse, Deceased v. American Photograph Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arbach v. GrubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Arbach v. GrubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Chengdu Gaishi Electronics, Ltd., Apps. v. G.a.e.m.s., Inc., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019