United States v. Donald Marutz

134 F.3d 380

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Donald MARUTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10178.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 1998*

Decided Jan. 21, 1998.

1

Before WALLACE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and REA,** District Judge.

ORDER

2

In our prior disposition, we held that "there was no error in…