Adibi v. Prestigious Homes By Frank Sadeghy, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1DissentCarl B. Jones, Judge
{1 The majority affirms the trial court's judgment which authorizes the sheriff, under writ of execution alone, to forcibly enter into Mrs. Sadeghy's private home to levy upon and seize personal property located therein. I dissent because the majority's opinion fails to address the illegality of the sheriffs actions which, in my opinion, violated Mrs. Sadeghy's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
1 2 The Fourth Amendment provides:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. William Michael SkowronskiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Farris v. CastorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940