In re Crowly
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
At Law. Application by the collector of the port of New York, under the provisions of section 15 of the act of congress entitled “An act to simplify the laws in relation to" the collection of the revenues,” approved June 10, 1890, for a review of the decision of the board of general appraisers at this port, separating or segregating the values for duty of certain merchandise imported during the months of February and March, 1891, and invoiced as entireties as wool robes with…
Read the full summary
At Law. Application by the collector of the port of New York, under the provisions of section 15 of the act of congress entitled “An act to simplify the laws in relation to" the collection of the revenues,” approved June 10, 1890, for a review of the decision of the board of general appraisers at this port, separating or segregating the values for duty of certain merchandise imported during the months of February and March, 1891, and invoiced as entireties as wool robes with silk embroidery, some with silk and metal embroidery, and some with silk and cotton embroidery, which goods were…
1Opinion of the Court
Lacombe, Circuit Judge.
The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Von OefeleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Arkell Safety Bag Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936