Legal Opinion

Tschida v. Tschida

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1927No. 25,777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff sued for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Defendant answered denying the accusation and by cross-bill demanded a divorce from plaintiff upon the same ground. The findings were that plaintiff’s allegations were not sustained but that defendant’s were true. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.

The first proposition is that defendant’s pleading, even as amended by the court in the findings, does not state a cause for divorce. There being nothing tending to show abuse of judicial discretion, we shall spend no time upon the propriety…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Albertson v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Olivieri v. EscartínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API