Tschida v. Tschida
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff sued for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Defendant answered denying the accusation and by cross-bill demanded a divorce from plaintiff upon the same ground. The findings were that plaintiff’s allegations were not sustained but that defendant’s were true. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.
The first proposition is that defendant’s pleading, even as amended by the court in the findings, does not state a cause for divorce. There being nothing tending to show abuse of judicial discretion, we shall spend no time upon the propriety…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Albertson v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Olivieri v. EscartínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.