Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Roe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1989PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1006OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of burglary and robbery after denial of a suppression motion challenging the admissibility of statements made to investigating and arresting police officers allegedly in violation of his rights under Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436) and Payton v New York (445 US 573).

During postarrest Miranda advisements, defendant stated to the police with respect to his right to consult with an attorney, "I have an attorney.” All conversations ceased. The officers, after further investigation, later…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. GriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. SilburnCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  4. People v. GutkaissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. LeftenantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API