Fortier v. Gumelsky
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Edwin L. Fortier against Lazard Gumelsky. Judgment rendered dissolving the injunction obtained by plaintiff, and plaintiff applies for writs of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.
A rule to show cause why an injunction obtained by the plaintiff, For-tier, should not be set aside, was made returnable on the 9th of the month.
Counsel for Fortier wrote to the judge, complaining that the time thus fixed was too short — indeed, was in violation of the rules of court, owing to intervening holidays — and asking for a continuance. The judge paid no attention to this letter, but proceeded to try the case at the time fixed, and to render judgment dissolving the injunction. This he did in the absence of Fortier and his attorney, but after they had been duly called at the door of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Newell v. NewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Taylor v. Shreveport Airport AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Citadel Builders, L.L.C. v. Dirt Worx of Louisiana, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2015