Legal Opinion
Henry & Hutchinson, Inc. v. Slack
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 4, 1955No. 35398PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
As we have related in the statement of facts, we are here concerned exclusively with the third count of the petition, which was added by amendment and to which there was no answer or plea. While the defendant answered counts one and two of the petition, the plaintiff struck the first count and the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant on the second count. Prior to the act of 1953 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dee. Sess., pp. 440, 444; Code, Ann. Supp., § 81-103), if a petition contained more than one count, such counts were treated as such completely separate and distinct entities of pleading…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Lovett v. Sandersville Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Jester v. Bainbridge State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Hightower v. Blakely Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spratlin, Harrington & Thomas, Inc. v. HawnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Carney v. Southland Loan Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Henry & Hutchinson v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Brewer v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.