Legal Opinion

In re Cleopatra Cameron Gift Trust

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2019No. #28424-a-MESPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalter, Justice

[¶1.] Trust beneficiary Cleopatra Cameron filed a petition in the circuit court requesting a determination of whether the trust's spendthrift provision prohibits direct payments of her child support obligation to her ex-husband, Christopher Pallanck. A California family court previously ordered the direct payments as part of the couple's divorce, citing a particular feature of California trust law. The circuit court concluded the direct payment order was a method of enforcing Cleopatra's child support obligation to be determined under local law and, therefore, not entitled to full faith and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jans v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. PLAINS COMMERCE BANK, INC. v. BECKSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT ASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In the Matter of Dereck Lee CliveSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
  5. Torgerson v. TorgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API