In re Cleopatra Cameron Gift Trust
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSalter, Justice
[¶1.] Trust beneficiary Cleopatra Cameron filed a petition in the circuit court requesting a determination of whether the trust's spendthrift provision prohibits direct payments of her child support obligation to her ex-husband, Christopher Pallanck. A California family court previously ordered the direct payments as part of the couple's divorce, citing a particular feature of California trust law. The circuit court concluded the direct payment order was a method of enforcing Cleopatra's child support obligation to be determined under local law and, therefore, not entitled to full faith and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jans v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- PLAINS COMMERCE BANK, INC. v. BECKSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT ASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- In the Matter of Dereck Lee CliveSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
- Torgerson v. TorgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024