Legal Opinion

In Re Lazzo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 2, 2007No. 97,219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent, Michael E. Lazzo, an attorney who was admitted to the practice of law in Kansas.

A disciplinary panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys conducted a formal hearing, as required by Kansas Supreme Court Rule 211 (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 284). The respondent appeared in person and with his attorney. In its final hearing report, the panel found that respondent had violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC) 3.3(d) (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 467) (duty of candor in ex parte…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re LandrithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. In the Matter of DevkotaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ComfortSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. In Re WoodringSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. In re ArabiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API