Martin v. Moore
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
Our Constitution, adopted in 1874, provides that all contracts for a greater rate of interest than 10% per annum shall be void as to principal and interest. Art. 19, § 13. The question here is whether the Constitution prohibits the practice, widely used in business transactions, of computing interest on the basis of a 360-day year. The Court of Appeals certified the case to us under Rule 29 (4). We have no hesitancy in holding, for practical, legal, and historical reasons, that the use of the 360-day year is lawful even when the interest rate is 10%.
In four separate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Exxon Corporation v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Cagle v. Boyle Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- First American National Bank v. McClure Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Southland Mobile Home Corp. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Storthz v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Douglas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Voitier v. First National Bank of CommerceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HutchersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.