Flood v. State Ex Rel. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Mundm, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of Fred S. Caldwell, against Z. T. Flood. From the judgment, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The following questions are raised in the petition in error:(1) Is section 24 of art. 3 of the Enforcing Act (Sess. Laws 1907-08, p. 612), empowering the Governor to appoint an attorney as counsel to the Governor, whose duty it shall be to enforce said act, repugnant to section 1 of art. 4 of the Constitution, and has (a) Bred S. Caldwell, as counsel to the Governor, the authority to institute this action in the name of the state?(2) Is section 12 of art. 3 of the Enforcing Act (Sess. Laws 1907-8, p. 607; Comp. Laws Okla. 1909, sec. 4191) in conflict with section 2 of art. 7 of .the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Ex Parte JustusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tucker v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Ikard v. Russell, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Herndon v. Hammond, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Corley v. Adair County CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.