Legal Opinion

Miller v. William A. Smith Constructing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 14, 1979No. 49,588PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

The Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion affirmed the district court’s judgment in this case holding all claims were barred by the three-year statute of limitations, K.S.A. 60-512(1). This statute covers actions brought upon obligations not in writing. We granted review to consider whether the five-year statute of limitations, K.S.A. 60-511(1), should govern. K.S.A. 60-511(1) provides:

“The following actions shall be brought within five (5) years: (1) An action upon any agreement, contract or promise in writing.”

The defendant, William…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fey v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Fairbanks v. KoellingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Bayless v. BaylessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Transamerica Oil Corporation v. Lynes, Inc. And Baker International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Matherly v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Zenda Grain & Supply Co. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Chilson v. Capital Bank of MiamiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Smith Ex Rel. Class Composed of All Oil & Gas Royalty Owners v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API