Legal Opinion
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Grossman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 19, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The question for decision is whether the respondent illegally engaged in the practice of medicine.
Prosecutor, State Board of Medical Examiners of New Jersey, caused a duly verified complaint to be filed in the Second Judicial District Court of the County of Middlesex charging that respondent, Joseph M. Grossman, practiced medicine (R. S. 45:9-18) during the months of November and December of 1944, in the City of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, without first having obtained a license (R. S. 45:9-22, as amended by Pamph. L. 1939, ch. 115, p. 419, §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. FifeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Jersey Chiropractic Ass'n v. State Board of Medical Examiners of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
- Blass v. WeigelDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Thomas v. Carlton Hosiery MillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951