Legal Opinion

Ripka v. Pope

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1850Published

APPEAL by plaintiff from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans. Strawbridge, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

This action is brought on three promissory notes, made in Pennsylvania. The defendants are the makers, and the plaintiff is payee. In one of them no place of payment is designated; in the two others is the expression, “ payable at the Philadelphia Bank.” No averment was made in the-petition, nor was it proved at the trial, that the two latter notes were presented at any time, at the Philadelphia Bank, nor to the makers any where before suit. The district judge gave judgment for the first note; but directed a non-suit as to the other two,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bond v. StorrsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
  2. Evans v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  3. Silver v. HendersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API