Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Elie v. Karst

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1992No. 92-CA-0232Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

TREVOR G. BRYAN, Judge Pro Tem.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

The question presented to this court, is whether or not applicant, C. Edwards Karst, who has been admitted to the practice of law in this state for more than five *933years, is ineligible to qualify as a candidate for judge of the Court of Appeal by virtue of the fact that since 1983 he has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court.

Eligibility for candidacy to the court of appeal is governed exclusively by Art. 5 § 24 of the Louisiana Constitution 1974, which reads as follows:

“A judge of the Supreme Court, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gamble v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API