Legal Opinion

Restucci v. Appeals Court

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 1, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William Restucci appeals from an order of a single justice of this court denying, without a hearing, relief in the nature of mandamus. Restucci sought *1032an order from the single justice compelling the Appeals Court to allow a motion for discovery, pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. R 30 (c) (4), 378 Mass. 900 (1979), that he had filed in the first instance in the Appeals Court in an appeal then pending before that court from a Superior Court judge’s denial of his motion for a new trial (to withdraw his guilty plea). A single justice of the Appeals Court previously had denied the discovery motion. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Forte v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. McCastleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. HinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of an Application for a Criminal ComplaintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Marides v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Watson v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API