Ramage v. Towles
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Chambers. Heard before the Hon. S. K. McSpadden.
1Opinion of the CourtSomeryille, J.
1. The bill was filed May 22,1888-— after the present Code went into effect — by Mrs. Towles, to enforce a vendor’s lien on certain lands sold by her to the defendant, Mrs. Ramage, who is a married woman. The note for the purchase-money was signed by both Mrs. Ramage and her husband. It is not, and can not be insisted, that the coverture of Mrs. Ramage was any defense to the enforcement of the vendor’s lien. — Crampton v. Prince, 83 Ala 246; s. c,, 3 Amer. State Rep. 718. It is insisted by demurrer, that the husband was a necessary party to the bill. Under the provisions of the present Code,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodall v. Kelly & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Tedder v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Rooney v. Michael & LyonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Bromberg Bros. v. Heyer Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Halliday v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Gravlee v. LamkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Wadsworth v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Kinney v. EnsmingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Bogan v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.