Legal Opinion

Strong v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2009No. 45A03-0806-CR-311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Michael Strong asks us to order a new sentencing hearing, arguing the trial court erroneously concluded it could not suspend his minimum sentence for attempted robbery. 1 We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Strong was charged with Class B felony robbery, Class B felony confinement, Class C felony battery, and Class D felony pointing a firearm. The day Strong's trial was to begin, defense counsel argued to the trial court that all the counts would have to merge if Strong were convicted after a trial, and therefore suggested the case could be disposed of without trial if…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Camden v. Gibson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dragon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Haggenjos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Greer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Holt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Danny Boling v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API