Legal Opinion

Gilchrist v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 29, 1965No. G-285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was informed against, tried by a jury, and convicted for the offense of assault with intent to commit rape. From the judgment and sentence based upon the verdict of guilty, this appeal is taken.

Appellant first questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. It is conceded by both parties that the gravamen of this offense is the intent with which the assault is made; and the intent in such case must b.e shown to have so possessed' the accused that his determination was to consummate the rape regardless of resistance and want of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dannelly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Merchant v. MerchantSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Giorge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Roundtree v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sylvia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Floyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. State v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Gorko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API