Legal Opinion

United States v. Stine, Timothy Walter

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 26, 1982No. 81-2471PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

This case, now before us for the second time, requires us to decide whether the requirement of psychological counseling as a condition of probation is an unconstitutional infringement on the appellant’s rights of privacy and mentation, and if not, whether it represents an abuse of the dis trict court’s discretion. We did not reach these questions in the previous appeal because they were raised only in defense to appellant’s failure to comply with the condition, not in direct challenge to its imposition. Appellant subsequently presented his argument…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Quema HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,011 United States of America v. Robert D. Alexander, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Mohamad AbushaarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. BankoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Edilberto Restor, Jr., Edwin M. Wintermyer, and Joseph A. Mastraieni, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API