Legal Opinion

In re Referendum on Question of Amending Pittsburgh Home Rule Charter

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

Edward S. Kiely (Kiely), as trustee ad litem for the Campaign for Responsible Government in Pittsburgh, appeals a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) setting aside a referendum petition on the bases that: (1) the petition lacked the required number of signatures pursuant to Section 232 of the Home Rule Charter and Optional Plans Law (Home Rule Charter Law), Act of April 13, 1972, P.L. 62, as amended, 53 P.S. § 1-232, and (2) the petition violated the five-year time restriction of Section 218 of the Home Rule Charter Law, 53 P.S. § 1-218.

FACTS

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Pennsylvania Retailers' Ass'n v. LazinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. MARSTON v. KLINECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Bradway v. CohenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination of WilsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API