Legal Opinion
United States v. Seymour
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 24, 2008No. 05-3904, 05-3944, 05-3946, 05-3947, 05-4284, 06-2779PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Andre Seymour, Artrez Nyroby Seymour (“Nyroby Seymour”), Kent Clark, Andre Lawrence, Stacia Smith, and Troy Lawrence (collectively, the “Defendants”) appeal their respective sentences, claiming that their Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the district court sentenced all Defendants under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) without having the jury make individualized findings regarding the quantities of drugs reasonably foreseeable to each defendant. Defendant Stacia Smith also asserts that the district court erred by not suppressing a gun found in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Gregory WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.