Legal Opinion
Handley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 30, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant Paul Handley is an inmate of the protective custody unit of the West Jefferson Correctional Facility. He alleges that the inmates who are in the protective custody unit (P/C) enjoy substantially fewer privileges than the inmates in the general population enjoy. They have fewer TV privileges, fewer daily gym privileges, less access to sports equipment and recreation, and reduced telephone privileges, and they are "locked-down" each day much sooner.
Handley contends that he has acquired a "liberty interest" in these privileges by virtue of Administrative Regulation 435. He here…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Palmigiano v. GarrahyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Collins v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Jacobs v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Block v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Andrews v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.