Legal Opinion
Johnson v. General Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtT. Paul Kane, J.
The primary issue before the court is whether or not a standard automobile policy issued by defendant General Mutual Insurance Co. to defendant Edward Kucskar was in force and effect at the time defendant Kucskar was involved in an automobile accident.
In June of 1961, defendant Kucskar obtained a standard automobile policy from the General Mutual Insurance Co. (hereinafter referred to as “ General ”), through one Paul T. Ahearn (hereinafter referred to as “Ahearn”). Due to the age of the defendant Kucskar, the policy was issued pursuant to the assigned risk plan and the policy period was from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nicholas Di Menna & Sons, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Cannon v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Stone v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. General Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Olenick v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Rotsettis v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Johnson v. General Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966