Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Crooks

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1885Published

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

The action is for conversion, and the complaint alleges that the defendants wrongfully took and carried away 58 boxes of tin, from the possession, custody and care of James M. Lyddy, and wrongfully and *149unlawfully thereafter converted the same to their own use. I/yddy was at the time the general assignee of Joseph Byrne & Co. He was subsequently discharged from his trust, and, by order of the court, made a re-assignment of the firm’s assets to the plaintiff, who brings this action, claiming $449.50 damages.

The question presented is whether there was a conversion by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kerr v. . MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Green v. . ClarkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Marsden v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Evarts v. . KiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. O'Brien v. HeeneyNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API