Legal Opinion

Albert v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 2001No. 00-35555; D.C. No. CV-98-01180-TSZPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Val Albert and Galen Cook appeal pro se the district court’s summary judgments for defendants in their action alleging state law claims and violations of the Labor-Management Reporting Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”). Appellants also alleged state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. Contractors Ass’n, 809 F.2d 626, 629-30 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment on appellant Cook’s federal claims because he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Finnegan v. LeuSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation, United States Ex Rel. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. United Steelworkers of America v. SadlowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,652 in Re William Eisen, Debtor. William Eisen v. Nancy Curry, Trustee, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API