Legal Opinion

Guesfeird v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 24, 1984No. 133 September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

In the instant appeal, appellant presents three issues. First, whether an unsolicited and inadvertent reference by the complaining witness to taking a lie detector test is ground for reversible error where the trial court denied appellant’s motion for a mistrial and gave a curative instruction. Secondly, whether appellant has a legitimate right to make a tactical decision regarding curative instructions being given in his favor, and thus, whether the trial court erred in so instructing the jury without consulting counsel. Thirdly, appellant questions whether the trial court erred…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Marini v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Hembree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Bohnert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API