Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kirby v. Suburban Electrical Engineers Contractors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 2011Published

1Dissent

Fahey, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I cannot agree with the majority that Supreme Court erred in granting that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking leave to renew their opposi*1382tion to the cross motion of defendant Suburban Electrical Engineers Contractors, Inc. (Suburban) for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it. I therefore would affirm as a matter of law.

This appeal arises from a November 10, 2004 incident in which Charles R. Kirby (plaintiff) was injured during the course of his employment with International Paper at one of its plants. The accident occurred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Church v. Callanan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Hamlet at Willow Creek Development Co. v. Northeast Land Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Gold v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API