Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Chicago, K. & T. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided March 2, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. BUI by the Central Trust Company of New York, against the Chicago, Kansas & Tezas Bailway Company to foreclose a mortgage. The Holton-Warren Lumber Company intervened, and claimed a mechanic’s lien. Heard on exceptions to the master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

This controversy arises on exceptions to the master’s report. The master has found that the inter-vener, the Holton-Warren.Lumber Company, furnished railroad ties and other timber to the Chicago, Kansas & Texas Railway Company between the dates of ^November 28,1890, and June 13,1891, on a running account, leaving a balance due to intervener of $1,774.90, with interest thereon. The master also finds that the intervener is entitled to a mechanic’s lien against the railroad and its appurtenances for the payment of said sum, which lien, he reports, should have priority…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Livermore v. WrighSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  2. Page v. BettesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Corby v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  4. Beckwith v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
  5. Squires v. Fithian's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. William R. Trigg Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  2. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe-Deposit Co. v. Roanoke Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896
  4. Coffey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Frick Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API