Bartlett v. Atkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Nancy Atkins, by her guardian, Micco T. Harjio-, against H. U. Bartlett, A. A. Hammser, the Gypsy Oil Company, "William S. Murphy, Wilber M Norris, W. H. Walton, and Ellis H. Hammet to recover real property and remove cloud from title of same. Judgment for plaintiff, and H. U. Bartlett, A. A. Hammier, a'id the Gypsy Oil Company bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtThacker, J.
Nancy Atkins, the defendant in error, an incompetent person, by her guardian, Micco T. liar jo, on July 23, 1913, commenced this action against H. U. Bartlett, A. A. Hammer, and Gyjisy Oil Company, plaintiffs in error, and .against William S. Murphy, Wilber M. Norris, W. AY. Walton, and Ellis H. Hammet, defendants in error, for the recovery of and to remove the cloud of certain purported, but forged, conveyances from the following described “allotted” real property situated in Creek county, to wit: The S. W. % of the N. W. % of section 4, and the S. W. 14 of the N. E. !4 and lot 2 of section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harman v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Muskogee Gas & Electric Co. v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Canadian Trading Co. v. RallsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parker v. U. S. Smelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mobilfone Service, Inc. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978