Legal Opinion

Braatz v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1993No. 91-1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Labor and Industry Review Commission ("LIRC") properly concluded that the marital status provisions of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act ("WFEA") permit the school district of Maple's health insurance nondupli-cation policy. The circuit court answered in the negative, and LIRC appealed from the judgment. The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court's judgment in Braatz v. LIRC, 168 Wis. 2d 124, 483 N.W.2d 246 (Ct. App. 1992).

We affirm the court of appeals reversal of LIRC's decision. The school district of Maple's nonduplication policy constitutes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees & Helpers Local No. 695 v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee Refining Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dilhr v. LircWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Swatek v. County of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wagner Mobil, Inc. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. KoopmansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Grube v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Motola v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API