Legal Opinion

McCook v. Halliburton-Myers Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1914No. 5355PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Macon — Judge Hodges. October 18, 1913.

1Opinion of the Court

Roan, J,

1. In-the absence of an agreement to the contrary, delivery of freight to a common carrier is regarded as delivery to the consignee. Mann v. Glauber, 96 Ga. 795 (22 S. E. 405) ; McCullough v. Armstrong, 118 Ga. 424 (45 S. E. 379). This rule may, however, be varied by agreement. If goods in a sound condition are delivered to a common carrier, and are found in a damaged condition when they arrive at their destination, the question of the consignee’s right to reject the goods would depend upon the terms of the contract with the shipper.

2. Where one by letter orders goods to be shipped by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mann v. GlauberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. McCullough Bros. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Colt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Colfax Gin Co. v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Baer & Son v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Truluck v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Adelman v. Centerre Bank of Kansas City, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API