In Re I.A.

(¶ 19} I agree that it was proper for the juvenile court to hold a classification hearing at the time of I.A.’s disposition. I write separately, however, to disavow the notion — as stated in the court of appeals’ opinion, 2012-Ohio-4973, ¶ 15, and as suggested by the majority at ¶ 14 and 17 — that the juvenile court could have also held a second R.C. 2152.83(B) hearing at the time of I.A.’s release. R.C. 2152.83(B) authorizes only a single hearing. A juvenile court may choose to hold that hearing either at the juvenile’s disposition or at the time of the juvenile’s release, but not at both.

*209Mat…