Fudim v. Kane
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.
This was an action of assumpsit by a mortgagor to recover a surplus alleged to be in the hands of the assignees of the mortgagee after a foreclosure sale.
Two mortgages existed dn plaintiff’s property, the first for $6,000 and the second for $12,000. The latter was held by defendants. Interest being in default thereon, acting under the power of sale in the mortgage they advertised a sale of the property. The sale as advertised was actually made with notice that it was subject to the first mortgage. At the sale were numerous bidders, one of whom bid $14,500. Among those present was the holder,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Bobbitt v. . StantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Gilson v. NessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Cassell v. RossIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Feuer v. CapilowichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bosler v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Armand's Engineering, Inc. v. Town and Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Wartell v. NovogradSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
- United States v. Kenneth OlsenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Wartell v. NovogradSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.